Hi,
On 25.04.2013 08:21, Antonin Kral wrote:
* Thorsten Glaser [2013-04-24 19:25] wrote:
Oh great, this one FTBFS on kfreebsd… again. Although that’s
not dependent on the delta between -3.1 and -5…
The -6 should address that. Debdiff attached. I am currently on
business
trip, but Thorsten j
Hi Adam,
* Thorsten Glaser [2013-04-24 19:25] wrote:
> Oh great, this one FTBFS on kfreebsd… again. Although that’s
> not dependent on the delta between -3.1 and -5…
The -6 should address that. Debdiff attached. I am currently on business
trip, but Thorsten jumped in and made a needed cherrypick
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>> Oh, lord, I really need vacation. Sorry for that. -5 is on the way.
> That looks better. :-) Thanks.
Oh great, this one FTBFS on kfreebsd… again. Although that’s
not dependent on the delta between -3.1 and -5…
p.d.o shows the reason:
[33]File
On 24.04.2013 11:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 24.04.2013 10:51, Antonin Kral wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt [2013-04-24 11:25]
wrote:
I see you've uploaded a 0.9.13-4 package, without providing a
debdiff as requested.
Please could you prepare a -5 package which fixes the reverted
changes? The debd
On 24.04.2013 10:51, Antonin Kral wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt [2013-04-24 11:25]
wrote:
I see you've uploaded a 0.9.13-4 package, without providing a
debdiff as requested.
Please could you prepare a -5 package which fixes the reverted
changes? The debdiff between -3.1 and -5 should then only cont
Hi Adam,
* Adam D. Barratt [2013-04-24 11:25] wrote:
> I see you've uploaded a 0.9.13-4 package, without providing a
> debdiff as requested.
>
> Please could you prepare a -5 package which fixes the reverted
> changes? The debdiff between -3.1 and -5 should then only contain
> your new patch and
On 23.04.2013 23:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 19:14 +0200, Antonin Kral wrote:
first of all thanks a lot for your great work getting Debian
release.
I've recently uploaded new version of Aranym which fixed a severity
grave problem in the previous version which is going to be
* Thorsten Glaser [2013-04-24 00:29] wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>
> >What we could consider is a 0.9.13-3.1+deb7u1 upload via
>
> Petr might be able to quickly point out what precise
> upstream commits/changes are the minimum needed to
> get this fixed.
Exactly, I've already dropped him an e
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
>What we could consider is a 0.9.13-3.1+deb7u1 upload via
I think 0.9.13-4 would also work, as it’s larger than wheezy
and smaller than sid.
Thanks Antonin!
Petr might be able to quickly point out what precise
upstream commits/changes are the minimum needed to
get this fi
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 00:15 +0200, Antonin Kral wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt [2013-04-24 00:05] wrote:
> > The difference between 0.9.13 and 0.9.15 appears to be quite a bit more
> > than just the fix for the RC bug. It's also picked up a dependency on a
> > version of mpfr4 that isn't in wheez
Hi Adam,
* Adam D. Barratt [2013-04-24 00:05] wrote:
> The difference between 0.9.13 and 0.9.15 appears to be quite a bit more
> than just the fix for the RC bug. It's also picked up a dependency on a
> version of mpfr4 that isn't in wheezy, so couldn't migrate in any case.
mpfr4 version is not
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 19:14 +0200, Antonin Kral wrote:
> first of all thanks a lot for your great work getting Debian release.
> I've recently uploaded new version of Aranym which fixed a severity
> grave problem in the previous version which is going to be included into
> wheezy - http://bugs.debi
Hello,
first of all thanks a lot for your great work getting Debian release.
I've recently uploaded new version of Aranym which fixed a severity
grave problem in the previous version which is going to be included into
wheezy - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698064
Could you plea
13 matches
Mail list logo
