Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-03-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote: I'm primarily concerned about reimplementing a bad piece of code (the second half of dwke that creates the .tpl files) in order to build a new feature on top of it. The perfectionist in me would like to fix things properly first.

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-02-25 Thread Dave Steele
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: In general I think we should allow the flexibility to have a per-section known-problems-directory setting, so each report Section should generate its own problem list and not get a global one passed OK, but out of

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-02-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Dave, On Samstag, 23. Februar 2013, Dave Steele wrote: I've reworked based on Andreas' issues related to detect_well_known_errors and rdeps. thanks! (extra bonus points if you could tell how many commits it are in each branch, due to rebase its rather easy for me to find out, but becoming

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-02-21 Thread Dave Steele
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: this work looks really promising and I'm curious to try it some day on my instance. But as I wrote before there is no need to reimplement the .tpl generation in python. Instead these intermediate files should go away

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-02-21 Thread Dave Steele
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: +if self.inc_re.search( logbody, re.MULTILINE ): +for line in logbody.splitlines(): +if self.inc_re.search( line ): +if self.exc_re == None \ +

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-02-20 Thread Dave Steele
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: ... these are quite some different changes, can you please isolate the commits for Sort known issues by reverse dependency count and rebase them onto current develop?! The new serial branches sort-issues-by-rdep and

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-01-27 Thread Dave Steele
The rest of my proposed changes for known problem handling are pushed, for review. A rebase is needed before merging. I will do this at your request. The following serial branch heads are involved: well-known - I've added tolerance for missing files and packages, and added PTS links

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-01-20 Thread Dave Steele
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote: ... What I'd like to see is (in probable order of implementation) * piuparts-report discovering all existing known problem descriptions instead of hardcoding them - need to add ordering information somehow, perhaps

Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count

2013-01-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2013-01-19 22:06, Dave Steele wrote: The well-known git branch implements a version of detect_well_known_errors to accomplish this. The script is ported from bash to python, to take advantage of the rdep capability of piupartsdb. It was developed alongside the bash script to support