On 2013-06-04 9:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-06-04 9:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Unfortunately the pu failed to build on powerpc. The cause is that
the
powerpc buildd now announces itself as "POWER7" arch, which is not
recognized by openblas. I guess this change has to do with the
buil
On 2013-06-04 9:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Unfortunately the pu failed to build on powerpc. The cause is that
the
powerpc buildd now announces itself as "POWER7" arch, which is not
recognized by openblas. I guess this change has to do with the buildd
being upgraded to wheezy.
I attach a new
Le jeudi 30 mai 2013 à 14:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On 2013-05-30 9:55, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Le lundi 27 mai 2013 à 21:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> >
> >> Please go ahead, using 0.1.1-6+deb7u1 as the version number. Any
> >> reports
> >
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2013-05-30 9:55, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Le lundi 27 mai 2013 à 21:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Please go ahead, using 0.1.1-6+deb7u1 as the version number. Any
reports
of successful tests on stable would be appreciated.
Thanks, uploaded.
Flagged for
Le lundi 27 mai 2013 à 21:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Please go ahead, using 0.1.1-6+deb7u1 as the version number. Any reports
> of successful tests on stable would be appreciated.
Thanks, uploaded.
I have tested the new package both with the tests provided by package
libblas-test, and
Sébastien Villemot (30/05/2013):
> I have tested the new package both with the tests provided by
> package libblas-test, and also with the testsuite on some project of
> which I am upstream (dynare). I got no regression compared to the
> version of openblas currently in Wheezy.
Thanks, appreciate
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:37 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 01:22 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> > gemv_crash_big_data.diff makes me sligtly nervous… I guess (hope)
> > those patches were heavily tested through the later releases?
>
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 01:22 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> gemv_crash_big_data.diff makes me sligtly nervous… I guess (hope)
> those patches were heavily tested through the later releases?
All those patches have been incorporated in upstream release 0.2.6
(released last February). They ha
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Villemot (31/01/2013):
> I would like to make the attached changes to the openblas
> package. The debdiff fixes several important bugs, related to
> crashes or wrong results in widely used functions (dot product and
> matrix-vector product). It also fixes support for 32-bi
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 699462 = pu
retitle 699462 pu: openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u1
tags 699462 + wheezy
thanks
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:38 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> I would like to make the attached changes to the openblas package. The debdiff
> fixes several impo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
Dear Release Team,
I would like to make the attached changes to the openblas package. The debdiff
fixes several important bugs, related to crashes or wron
11 matches
Mail list logo
