Hi Andres,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 08:18:37PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
You should send the patch to the mailing list instead.
No response from upstream so far. Any chance we can push this into
Debian now that GNOME 3.8 is shaping up in experimental? It's not like
we're creating a fork. If
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 08:18:37PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
You should send the patch to the mailing list instead.
Done
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg59561.html
Cheers,
-- Guido
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Hi Andres,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 01:59:16AM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
tag 702372 +patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:38:22PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Package: gstreamer0.10-crystalhd
Version:
You should send the patch to the mailing list instead.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
Hi Andres,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 01:59:16AM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
tag 702372 +patch
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org wrote:
tag 702372 +patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:38:22PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Package: gstreamer0.10-crystalhd
Version: 1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'd be great to have a
tag 702372 +patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:38:22PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Package: gstreamer0.10-crystalhd
Version: 1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'd be great to have a version built against gstreamer 1.0 in
experimental since GNOME/totem
Package: gstreamer0.10-crystalhd
Version: 1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'd be great to have a version built against gstreamer 1.0 in
experimental since GNOME/totem uses gstreamer 1.0 there already. I've
added patches here:
7 matches
Mail list logo