On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po
changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably
have been more useful, fwiw.
Noted for the future.
The source and amd64 binaries are
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 06:27 -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
Per the IRC discussion, I have prepared postfix_2.9.6-2 for wheezy.
Please let me know when to upload it. The debdiff is below.
A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po
changes and
Per the IRC discussion, I have prepared postfix_2.9.6-2 for wheezy. Please let
me know when to upload it. The debdiff is below.
The source and amd64 binaries are to be found at:
deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
lamont
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
in the bug log for
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 06.03.2013 08:09, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal
is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my
message
in the bug log for details.
If LaMont is not currently available to
Op woensdag 6 maart 2013 10:16:18 schreef Adam D. Barratt:
It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in
2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the
current wheezy package, however.
Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
7 matches
Mail list logo