Control: severity -1 important
Le samedi 09 mars 2013 à 22:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
I think we should first decide whether this issue is RC (because of
Wheezy to be released soon), and this is indeed not obvious. It is of
course expected that packages in main install fine in
On 13.03.2013 21:45, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Control: severity -1 important
Le samedi 09 mars 2013 à 22:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
I think we should first decide whether this issue is RC (because of
Wheezy to be released soon), and this is indeed not obvious. It is of
course
Package: matlab-support
Version: 0.0.18
Severity: serious
in a clean testing chroot:
Setting up matlab-support (0.0.18) ...
No matlab found and maybe running in non-interactive mode. No way out --
failing...
dpkg: error processing matlab-support (--configure):
subprocess installed
Control: tags -1 + patch
Le samedi 09 mars 2013 à 14:18 +0100, Julian Taylor a écrit :
Package: matlab-support
Version: 0.0.18
Severity: serious
in a clean testing chroot:
Setting up matlab-support (0.0.18) ...
No matlab found and maybe running in non-interactive mode. No way out --
But should it exit nicely if no matlab is present???
Absent matlab == matlab cannot be supported == error in my vision of
how things should be handled in this package. Having it installed
without error should provide some guarantee that Matlab is present so
that dependent packages could rely on
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013, Julian Taylor wrote:
also it has dozens of upgrade and installation failures in ubuntu,
probably not relevant for Debian, but it sheds a bad light on the
quality of the package.
in Ubuntu...
Meanwhile, this package in Debian has only following bugs:
Status
2
On 09.03.2013 15:19, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
But should it exit nicely if no matlab is present???
Absent matlab == matlab cannot be supported == error in my vision of
how things should be handled in this package. Having it installed
without error should provide some guarantee that Matlab
Yes it would be great to have bugs fixed in Debian too, especially if they get
reported on Debian systems... as for this particular one I consider it a
feature :-)
Keep us updated on what you figure out
--
Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.orgwrote:
The attached patch allows the package to install nicely even if MATLAB
is not present. Otherwise people who install the package by accident end
up with a dpkg error.
Julian: please confirm that it fixes the
On 09.03.2013 18:26, Michael Hanke wrote:
Hi,
I see the problem, but I am not convinced this change is the solution.
Installing this package is pointless without Matlab, it should not be
pulled in as a dependency unless
a package gets installed that requires matlab.
If we make this
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 18:45 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
A problem with failing the installation if matlab is missing is that it
prevents migration from Ubuntus proposed repository to the main one.
Migration requires that it installs and does also not make other
packages uninstallable.
E.g.
On 09.03.2013 19:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 18:45 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
A problem with failing the installation if matlab is missing is that it
prevents migration from Ubuntus proposed repository to the main one.
Migration requires that it installs and does also not
Am 09.03.2013 19:10 schrieb Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 18:45 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
A problem with failing the installation if matlab is missing is that it
prevents migration from Ubuntus proposed repository to the main one.
Migration requires that
Control: tags -1 - patch
Le samedi 09 mars 2013 à 18:26 +0100, Michael Hanke a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Sébastien Villemot
sebast...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch allows the package to install nicely even
if MATLAB
is not present. Otherwise
14 matches
Mail list logo
