"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> * Niels Thykier [130320 16:25]:
>> As I recall, when d/s/format was advertised as "soon-to-be-mandatory"
>> it caused quite a riot among some people. Do we have any reason to
>> believe that has changed since then?
> Making this file mandatory is the only sensible
* Niels Thykier [130320 16:25]:
> On 2013-03-09 23:30, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > missing-debian-source-format is currently hidden away as
> > informational, although the large number of packages with
> > this defect makes it almost impossible to switch dpkg-source
> > to properly require that fi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-03-09 23:30, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.10.4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> missing-debian-source-format is currently hidden away as
> informational, although the large number of packages with
> this defect makes it almost i
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
missing-debian-source-format is currently hidden away as
informational, although the large number of packages with
this defect makes it almost impossible to switch dpkg-source
to properly require that file. (And the 1.0 implied by
t
4 matches
Mail list logo
