Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Justin B Rye wrote:
* Run aptitude and look for the Obsolete and Locally
Created Packages category, which will contain packages
from previous releases that you never bothered to remove.
These may be obsolete, but unless they're *also* redundant
Justin B Rye wrote:
[...] It seems to me we should put all our coverage of
redundant packages in 4.4.3 (mentioning apt-get autoremove and
avoiding the word obsolete), put all our coverage of relic packages
in 4.9, and leave the two sections completely unconnected.
Here's an attempt at a patch
Justin B Rye wrote:
Is it still true that deborphan is highly recommended, or is that a
leftover from the days when it was the only tool that implemented any
of this functionality?
And does popcon-largest-unused still work? It thinks I don't use my
web browser or window manager. Is it
Justin B Rye wrote:
Justin B Rye wrote:
[...] It seems to me we should put all our coverage of
redundant packages in 4.4.3 (mentioning apt-get autoremove and
avoiding the word obsolete), put all our coverage of relic packages
in 4.9, and leave the two sections completely unconnected.
Package: release-notes
Version: r9661
Tags: wheezy patch
Justin B Rye wrote:
I don't see anything about apt-get autoremove in the copy I've just
checked out of SVN... nothing about that or aptitude's older support
for the same feature.
Yeah, that was me guessing about the intent. There's no
5 matches
Mail list logo
