On 05/23/2013 05:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I can prepare a patch if you want which is backwards-compatible
> with older pango1.0 versions.
that would be nice, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
In
found 704872 0.8.8-7
thanks
Hi Daniel,
I've bumped the severity of this bug since pango1.0 1.32 has been
uploaded to unstable in the mean time.
Unfortunately your changes in 0.8.8-7 are incorrect / insufficient to
deal with the changes in pango1.0, thus I'm reopening the bug report.
The issue he
severity 704872 serious
thanks
pango1.0 1.32.5 is now in unstable so this is serious.
On 08/04/13 09:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
reassign 704872 plymouth
Hi Alex,
On 04/07/2013 02:44 AM, Alex Vanderpol wrote:
Package: libpango1.0-0
Version: 1.32.5-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer
I probably should have mentioned I applied a patch for Plymouth that
updated the hook to work with the newer versions of Pango (at least, the
ones that still supplied separate modules). I don't think the patch was
done properly though as it relies on pango-querymodules from the
development pack
reassign 704872 plymouth
Hi Alex,
On 04/07/2013 02:44 AM, Alex Vanderpol wrote:
Package: libpango1.0-0
Version: 1.32.5-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The latest version of Pango appears to be fairly problematic, first with i386
packages not recognizing the transitional package for all
Package: libpango1.0-0
Version: 1.32.5-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The latest version of Pango appears to be fairly problematic, first with i386
packages not recognizing the transitional package for all architectures
(already filed a separate bug about that), and now I discover that th
6 matches
Mail list logo