notforwarded 707195
stop
On 26.05.13 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> tags 707195 - fixed-upstream
> tags 707195 + wontfix
> stop
>
> On 15.05.13 Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm not thrilled at the concept of making significant documentation
> > changes to
Hi Sam,
On Mi, 15 Mai 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'm not thrilled at the concept of making significant documentation changes
to the upstream docs in order to get this to build.
It is not a thing about significant changes, just change all
the occurrences of
@itemx
without a preceeding
tags 707195 - fixed-upstream
tags 707195 + wontfix
stop
On 15.05.13 Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
I'm not thrilled at the concept of making significant documentation
changes to the upstream docs in order to get this to build.
The texinfo people (K. Berry) refused to revert
control: affects -1 krb5
Hi.
I'm trying to get a security update of krb5 into sid, and this issue is
breaking that build.
I'm not thrilled at the concept of making significant documentation changes to
the upstream docs in order to get this to build.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
forwarded 707195 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38997
stop
On 15.05.13 Sam Hartman (hartm...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to get a security update of krb5 into sid, and this issue is
breaking that build.
I'm not thrilled at the concept of making significant documentation changes
to
I'd strongly recommend making this bug sevirity serious.
I don't think we want to be unable to build a bunch of stuff in testing.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sorry guys,
I have the feeling you are missing something...
On Mi, 15 Mai 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'm trying to get a security update of krb5 into sid, and this issue is
breaking that build.
That is not my problem. This has to be fixed either upstream
or in the eronous .texi file.
What do
The concern I have is that I'd like to upload a very small patch that
fixes a security issue to the krb5 package in sid and get it into
testing quickly.
I am nervous when I think about including that patch along with a bunch
of doc changes.
In general, when we're going to break a bunch of
On 15.05.13 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
I have the feeling you are missing something...
On Mi, 15 Mai 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:
I'm trying to get a security update of krb5 into sid, and this issue is
breaking that build.
That is not my problem. This has to be
9 matches
Mail list logo