On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:52:17PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
Also, is there any relation between this and the old 'debmake' package
or they just happen to have the same name?
My first thought upon seeing this ITP was, whyever for would anyone want to
resurrect debmake.
Please choose another
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:43:59AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:52:17PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
Also, is there any relation between this and the old 'debmake' package
or they just happen to have the same name?
My first thought upon seeing this
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:36:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
This sounds almost exactly like what dh-make already does, with a few
incremental enhancements. Why should we have this in the archive as a
separate package, instead of improving the existing tool? Dividing efforts
between two
Hi,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:36:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:40:39AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
This package helps you to convert a upstream source package (or VCS
contents) into the Debian package by adding files required for the Debian
source package.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:36:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
The debmake command invoked in the upstream source tree without
any option can generate template files which is good enough to
create a single arch=any Debian binary package for local use.
This sounds almost exactly like
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:40:39AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
This package helps you to convert a upstream source package (or VCS
contents) into the Debian package by adding files required for the Debian
source package. The generated debian/rules file uses the new dh command
syntax from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org
* Package name: debmake
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org
* URL : none yet
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python3
Description : helper script to make the
7 matches
Mail list logo
