2014-03-27 13:50 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle mathi...@m9s.biz:
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server (Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:06:53 +0100):
You are correct that having 2 running Tryton servers is not
helpful/wise. That is why having a service
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server (Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:18:22 +0100):
2014-03-27 13:50 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle mathi...@m9s.biz:
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server (Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:39:05 +0100):
The GNU Health package runs its own dedicated Tryton server, under
that gnuhealth user, unoconv would thus run under the same user as the
Tryton server.
I think
2014-03-27 12:46 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle mathi...@m9s.biz:
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server (Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:39:05 +0100):
The GNU Health package runs its own dedicated Tryton server, under
that gnuhealth user, unoconv would
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server (Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:06:53 +0100):
2014-03-27 12:46 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle mathi...@m9s.biz:
* Emilien Klein: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#707639: gnuhealth: System
user for the server
The GNU Health package runs its own dedicated Tryton server, under
that gnuhealth user, unoconv would thus run under the same user as the
Tryton server.
The rationale for using a separate user is explained at length at [0],
short version is that I believe a Debian package should (as much as
X-Debbugs-CC: tryton-deb...@lists.virtual-things.org
Package: gnuhealth
Version: 1.8.1-1 (svn rev 13528)
Severity: important
Please drop creation and usage of the gnuhealth user.
While it is obviously preferable to run a tryton server under a user
account, it is generally not a good
7 matches
Mail list logo
