Charles Plessy writes:
> With the addition above, I call for seconds (patch attached). Markus,
> please raise your hand if I was wrong to think that this addition
> correctly addresses your comments.
This looks great, Charles. Thank you. Seconded.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
Control: tag -1 patch
Le Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:09:48PM +0100, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>
> Seconded.
>
> Thank you for keeping me in the loop. I think the above wording is
> sensible and addresses my concerns and those of others here in this
> thread. Thanks for your work on the Policy.
Many
Hello Charles,
On 14.02.2014 00:46, Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
> In his original wording, Josselin proposed to add at the end of section 9.6
> one
> sentence pointing to the Debian menu as an option. Here it is, rephrased to
> replace “legacy window managers” by “window managers that do not sup
Hi
On Friday 14 February 2014 08:46:01 Charles Plessy wrote:
> Thanks also Markus for your comments during the last round of dicussion on
> debian-devel.
> In his original wording, Josselin proposed to add at the end of section 9.6
> one sentence pointing to the Debian menu as an option. Here it
Charles Plessy (2014-02-14):
> With the addition above, I call for seconds (patch attached). Markus,
> please raise your hand if I was wrong to think that this addition
> correctly addresses your comments.
Since I know nothing about Multimedia handlers, and since I'm probably
not going to learn t
On Friday 14 February 2014 08:46:01 Charles Plessy wrote:
[snip]
> In his original wording, Josselin proposed to add at the end of section 9.6
> one sentence pointing to the Debian menu as an option. Here it is,
> rephrased to replace “legacy window managers” by “window managers that do
> not sup
Le Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:32:43PM +0100, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
>
> I have the impression that most people seems to agree on something like this.
> I think I might even stretch it and call it a 'rough consensus' with a couple
> of people in the rough end of it.
>
> Can we please move it forwar
Hi peoples
I have the impression that most people seems to agree on something like this.
I think I might even stretch it and call it a 'rough consensus' with a couple
of people in the rough end of it.
Can we please move it forward?
Thanks
Sune
On Saturday 11 January 2014 11:46:10 Charles P
Dear all,
there is an ongoing discussion about the documentation of menu systems on the
debian-policy mailing list, which led to proposed changes and it was suggested
to give them a better coverage.
On part of the proposal is about the description of the FreeDesktop menu system
and its integratio
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:46:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have read a lot of scepticism about the Debian menu in this thread, and no
> actual support for it. Perhaps I was trying to be too consensual and proposed
> an over-complicated solution while it is clear that
Hello everybody,
I have read a lot of scepticism about the Debian menu in this thread, and no
actual support for it. Perhaps I was trying to be too consensual and proposed
an over-complicated solution while it is clear that the FreeDesktop system is
superior.
I attached a new patch, where the De
11 matches
Mail list logo
