If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest.
I'd recommend uploading without delay.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 06/17/13 21:27, Sam Hartman wrote:
If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest.
I'd recommend uploading without delay.
I can't but I think it may be preferable since the landing of version in
experimental may encounter some delay, krb5 is widely linked
Regards
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the
discussion.
Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want to revert
this change...
So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway.
/me wishes that uploads were blocked if
Raphael == Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
Raphael On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for
the discussion.
Raphael Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want
Raphael to revert this
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:
As it turns out krb5 upstream has abandoned texinfo as their doc system.
Ben kaduk has done most of the work of moving to the new upstream
version so i'll do that.
https://github.com/kaduk/krb5/commits/debian-1.11 is where my current
version lives.
Actually, it's probably easier if I make the updates.
rationale:
You have your repo mixed in with something else.
It makes a bit harder to construct the initial dpm state.
but I can take what you have and the 1.11.2 tarball and prepsource
myself and then rsync the repo into place on alioth.
It
As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update.
how critical is that?
do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:
As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update.
how critical is that?
do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5?
I'm not entirely sure.
I think that the libverto update addressed some issues with respect to
dladdr() dependencies which made building
Package: src:krb5
Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures:
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org writes:
Package: src:krb5
Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures:
10 matches
Mail list logo