Bug#708991: choreonoid: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not quite as expected

2013-06-12 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
found 708991 1.1.0+dfsg-4 thanks Thomas Moulard writes: > I also had to write a patch to port choreonoid to Boost Filesystem v3 so > that the package compiles on Ubuntu. I hope this won't disturb the symbols > file. Alas, it did. > Thanks for following this issue. No problem. Sorry to keep b

Bug#708991: choreonoid: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not quite as expected

2013-06-03 Thread Thomas Moulard
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > found 708991 1.1.0+dfsg-3 > thanks > > Thanks for taking care of this! Most architectures now fare better, but > the logs for 1.1.0-3 still show mismatches on kfreebsd-amd64 and > powerpc; could you please take another look? I am waiting for

Bug#708991: choreonoid: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not quite as expected

2013-06-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
found 708991 1.1.0+dfsg-3 thanks Thanks for taking care of this! Most architectures now fare better, but the logs for 1.1.0-3 still show mismatches on kfreebsd-amd64 and powerpc; could you please take another look? -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mi

Bug#708991: choreonoid: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not quite as expected

2013-05-19 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: choreonoid Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of choreonoid for architectures other than amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64 have been failing because libcnoid1.symbols doesn't quite match the libraries' actual contents, as detailed at https://bui