Bug#709378: ifupdown: ifup tries to bring up lo twice if lo appears in /etc/network/interfaces

2014-10-27 Thread Francois Gouget
Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.49 Followup-For: Bug #709378 This bug is still present in ifupdown 0.7.49. Note that this makes it impossible to use the pre-up command in the interfaces file. This can have puzzling and annoying consequences for anyone who planned to use that to set up the firewa

Bug#709378: ifupdown: ifup tries to bring up lo twice if lo appears in /etc/network/interfaces

2013-05-24 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On 24 May 2013 14:07, Matthew Foulkes wrote: >> root@bee:~# ifup -v lo >> ip link set up dev lo 2>/dev/null >> Configuring interface lo=lo (inet) >> run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d >> run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wpasupplicant >> run-parts --verbose /etc/netwo

Bug#709378: ifupdown: ifup tries to bring up lo twice if lo appears in /etc/network/interfaces

2013-05-24 Thread Matthew Foulkes
Hi Andrew, On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:13:21 +0100 > Matthew Foulkes wrote: > > > Since ifupdown 0.7.43 entered testing, I have noticed "ifup -v lo" and > > "ifdown -v lo" attempting to bring the loopback interface up/down

Bug#709378: ifupdown: ifup tries to bring up lo twice if lo appears in /etc/network/interfaces

2013-05-22 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:13:21 +0100 Matthew Foulkes wrote: > Since ifupdown 0.7.43 entered testing, I have noticed "ifup -v lo" and > "ifdown -v lo" attempting to bring the loopback interface up/down > twice. Please elaborate that. I have specifically changed the internal definition of th

Bug#709378: ifupdown: ifup tries to bring up lo twice if lo appears in /etc/network/interfaces

2013-05-22 Thread Matthew Foulkes
Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.43 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Since ifupdown 0.7.43 entered testing, I have noticed "ifup -v lo" and "ifdown -v lo" attempting to bring the loopback interface up/down twice. I guess this is because ifup/ifdown now predefine lo internally as an auto interface