Any word on that other group working on a shared library?
Obviously it is just a few lines of automake, so presumably they're
thinking about how to make the API stable.
Given the low churn rate on this package, I'm not sure that's really an issue!
Cheers,
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Barak A. Pearlmutter ba...@cs.nuim.ie writes:
Okay, I picked your commit and made some related modifications. See
collab-maint main branch for details.
I'm about ready to dput it ... but I sort of feel like a reality check
is needed. Here is my question.
There is no static (or dynamic)
Okay, I picked your commit and made some related modifications. See
collab-maint main branch for details.
I'm about ready to dput it ... but I sort of feel like a reality check
is needed. Here is my question.
There is no static (or dynamic) library. (Obviously the build system
could be
Package: scrypt
Version: 1.1.6-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Would you kindly provide a -dev package for scrypt so that the header
files are available for other programs to compile against? In
particular I'm working on a python-scrypt package that currently is
embedding the entire scrypt source
tag 710440 + patch
thanks
Hello,
I tried to push a branch to collab-maint that implements this, but I got
an error.
This is what I think would accomplish this:
commit e40233380cd5088f69f0376a6bc43ccc3b83846b
Author: Micah Anderson mi...@debian.org
Date: Thu May 30 16:12:49 2013 -0400
I was finally able to push that feature branch, if you would prefer to
look at it via the git repository.
thanks,
micah
pgpBX0jIfM7vt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
