Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 patch intrigeri intrig...@debian.org (2013-09-17): Cyril Brulebois wrote (17 Sep 2013 18:14:34 GMT) : Do you have a patch handy, or should I take care of that now? I don't, feel free to take care of that :) There you go. I don't mind somebody else's uploading it, was just

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-17 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
intrigeri (intrig...@debian.org) wrote: If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in BitlBee should now be considered as not maintained. There's a fix actually, I've just not managed to take a closer look at it, plus ther was some comment that it might not be complete

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (17 Sep 2013 13:33:53 GMT) : Argh! I had no idea this was blocking other packages, sorry. :-( Well it'd be easy to just omit the bitlbee-plugin-otr package from Debian for now while this is getting resolved. Although omitting a single binary package is probably

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org (2013-09-17): Would you mind a NMU that disables building of bitlbee-plugin-otr in debian/control, drops the build-dep on libotr2-dev, comments out everything related to otr in debian/rules, and disables building of the OTR stuff at configure time? (+

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (17 Sep 2013 18:14:34 GMT) : looks good to me (that's at least what came to mind while reading the beginning of the thread). Thanks. Do you have a patch handy, or should I take care of that now? I don't, feel free to take care of that :) Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-09-08 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (30 Jul 2013 07:47:05 GMT) : Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (06 Jul 2013 16:05:27 GMT) : Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the next weeks. Any news on this front? If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in BitlBee

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-07-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (06 Jul 2013 16:05:27 GMT) : Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the next weeks. Any news on this front? (I'd like to stress out, since it may not be obvious to everyone involved here, that libotr4 and later prevents protocol

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-07-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:47 +0200, julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: your package build-depends on libotr2-dev, which is no longer built in sid as it has been replaced by libotr5-dev. Please port your package to the new library. Any news? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-07-06 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
On 06-07-13 16:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 14:47 +0200, julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: your package build-depends on libotr2-dev, which is no longer built in sid as it has been replaced by libotr5-dev. Please port your package to the new library. Any news? The guy

Bug#711071: bitlbee: please port to libotr5-dev

2013-07-06 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the next weeks. Wilmer v/d Gaast. -- + .''`. - -- ---+ +- -- --- - --+ | wilmer : :' : gaast.net | | OSS Programmer www.bitlbee.org | | lintux `. `~' debian.org | | Full-time geek