Daniel Baumann [Mon Jun 17, 2013 at 12:40:57PM +0200]:
On 06/17/2013 12:21 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
But 3:6.00~pre4+dfsg-11 is not a stable version AFAICT
it's identical to 5.01 but has additional uefi support.
And which upstream version number does that match?
Or in another way:
Which
On 06/19/2013 05:33 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Which syslinux in Debian is close upstream Syslinux 5.10?
6.00~pre5 equals 5.10 plus uefi.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:
Package: syslinux
Version: 3:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u3
Severity: wishlist
Quoting http://www.syslinux.org/ -
| 2013-05-04 : Syslinux 5.10 released.
| 2013-01-28 : Syslinux 5.01 released.
| 2012-12-06 : Syslinux 5.00 released.
| 2012-10-23 : Syslinux 4.06 released.
Since e.g. 4.06 includes isohybrid:
* Daniel Baumann [Mon Jun 17, 2013 at 12:10:26PM +0200]:
Version: 3:6.00~pre4+dfsg-11
On 06/17/2013 11:39 AM, Michael Prokop wrote:
Since e.g. 4.06 includes isohybrid: Workaround for various EFI
systems. it would be nice to have a new stable version of syslinux
in Debian.
this is
On 06/17/2013 12:21 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
But 3:6.00~pre4+dfsg-11 is not a stable version AFAICT
it's identical to 5.01 but has additional uefi support.
Any plans to provide it or a stable version to unstable?
when the experimental package is ready for unstable, i'll upload it to
* Daniel Baumann [Mon Jun 17, 2013 at 12:40:57PM +0200]:
On 06/17/2013 12:21 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
But 3:6.00~pre4+dfsg-11 is not a stable version AFAICT
it's identical to 5.01 but has additional uefi support.
I see, thanks
Any plans to provide it or a stable version to unstable?
6 matches
Mail list logo
