Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

Am Do., 15. Feb. 2018 um 21:55 Uhr schrieb Andreas Henriksson : > not great about this. Feels like overengineering. I think we > might need something much "simpler" in the hope that if we invent less > we'll get less stuff wrong. It should also help when we try to sell > our solution to the

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:55:42PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:31:28AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > systemd-journal-syslog Depends on systemd-journal-persistent | > > systemd-journal-transient (so that you *can* still explicitly choose to > > have syslog with

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:31:28AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > How about this: > > systemd-journal-transient ships > /usr/lib/systemd/journald.conf.d/transient.conf which explcitly disables > the persistent jorunal by setting Storage=volatile. > > systemd-journal-persistent ships >

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:16:20PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:07:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:14:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > [...] > > > - (How to handle updates? Consensus seemed to be towards no change on > > >

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:14:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Mostly for the record... > > I asked Michael Biebl about this bug report and if it's time to > reconsider it for Buster. He mentioned it probably should and that he > now sees the journal as being mature and robust enough, but

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:07:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:14:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: [...] > > - (How to handle updates? Consensus seemed to be towards no change on > >updates.) > > I'm interested in helping with this. > > I think we should

Bug#717388: Volunteers needed to work on enabling persistent journal

Mostly for the record... I asked Michael Biebl about this bug report and if it's time to reconsider it for Buster. He mentioned it probably should and that he now sees the journal as being mature and robust enough, but that he does not have time to work on it. The same likely goes for the rest of