Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-04-19 0:43, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Given how close we are to the upload window for 7.5 closing (over
this weekend), I'm prepared to accept the fix as-is on the assumption
that it will
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-04-17 22:46, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'm slightly torn on this one. Whilst the patch seems obviously
correct, it's not applied to the package in unstable, which is
usually a requirement for
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Given how close we are to the upload window for 7.5 closing (over
this weekend), I'm prepared to accept the fix as-is on the assumption
that it will get to unstable in the very near future, so please go
ahead with the
On 2014-04-16 23:10, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:25:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload; thanks.
If you agree I'd like to fix 2 other bugs: #709240 and #714388
#709240 is fixed by a 2 lines patch (syntax error with Perl 5.14
present in
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
I'm slightly torn on this one. Whilst the patch seems obviously
correct, it's not applied to the package in unstable, which is
usually a requirement for accepting a patch for stable. There's an
argument that it's unlikely
Adam,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:25:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Apologies for the huge delay in getting back to you regarding this.
Please go ahead with the upload; thanks.
If you agree I'd like to fix 2 other bugs: #709240 and #714388
#709240 is fixed by a 2 lines patch (syntax
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 19:01 +0200, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:15:54AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
To reduce user perplexity, I guess we could consider getting sympa to
catch this situation instead, which would reduce side
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:15:54AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
To reduce user perplexity, I guess we could consider getting sympa to
catch this situation instead, which would reduce side effects. I think
something along the lines of this commit would go in a better direction
that
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-07-21):
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 15:27:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-07-21 15:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Whichever solution was chosen, it looks like this bug is not fixed in
unstable yet?
Yes, I wanted to write a sentence about
Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 15:07 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Sympa fails to install if the ca-certificates trigger has never been
run, yet. #717435
One solution is to add a Pre-Depends: ca-certificates to sympa
(suggested patch attached).
The other solution
On 2013-07-21 15:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Whichever solution was chosen, it looks like this bug is not fixed in
unstable yet?
Yes, I wanted to write a sentence about this as well ...
If the release team considers adding a pre-depends in stable as
acceptable, I would first upload a NMU to sid
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 15:27:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-07-21 15:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Whichever solution was chosen, it looks like this bug is not fixed in
unstable yet?
Yes, I wanted to write a sentence about this as well ...
If the release team considers adding
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Sympa fails to install if the ca-certificates trigger has never been
run, yet. #717435
One solution is to add a Pre-Depends: ca-certificates to sympa
(suggested patch attached).
The other
13 matches
Mail list logo
