Hi All,
ODB 2.4.0 was released a few days ago[1]. I also see[2] that libcutl,
which was holding up packaging of ODB 2.3.0, is already in testing,
though for 2.4.0 it will need to be updated to 1.9.0.
Any chance we can finally get this done? I am, as a long-time Debian
user myself, really sad to s
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 16:01:53 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> It's up to you. I've updated libcutl package to 1.8.0 and corrected
> all the problems meanwhile. It's ready to be uploaded.
> As you are the ITP owner, I can step back of course. We may maintain
> it together even.
nvm the
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Onur Aslan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 14:32:17 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> It has a dependency on libcutl that Onur wanted to package. It was in
>> a good shape and I noted some issues to him, but didn't receive an
>> answer.
>> Onur, do you st
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 14:32:17 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> It has a dependency on libcutl that Onur wanted to package. It was in
> a good shape and I noted some issues to him, but didn't receive an
> answer.
> Onur, do you still working on it? May I continue with it, take over your
Hi Boris,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Boris Kolpackov
wrote:
> I am the developer of ODB. Today I announced the availability
> of ODB packages for RHEL 5 and 6, as well as Fedora 19-21.
> While this is great news, what saddens me somewhat, as a Debian
> user myself, is that there are no such
Hi,
I am the developer of ODB. Today I announced the availability
of ODB packages for RHEL 5 and 6, as well as Fedora 19-21.
While this is great news, what saddens me somewhat, as a Debian
user myself, is that there are no such packages for Debian yet.
At the same time I believe it should now be
6 matches
Mail list logo
