I agree with the option 2: please ship the 0.3 branch as soon as
possible, the 0.1 one is dead and is not developed any more and IMHO
there are no reasons to continue to distribute it!
...PLEASE!!!
Piviul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
At this point, I see 4 options:
1) status quo - leave supertux 0.1.x in sid, and supertux 0.3.x in
experimental
2) only ship development version - upload supertux 0.3.x to unstable
3) offer both versions, defaulting to development version when user
runs apt-get install supertux
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
At this point, I see 4 options:
1) status quo - leave supertux 0.1.x in sid, and supertux 0.3.x in
experimental
2) only ship development version - upload supertux 0.3.x to unstable
3) offer both versions, defaulting
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:40:27AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
At this point, I see 4 options:
1) status quo - leave supertux 0.1.x in sid, and supertux 0.3.x in
experimental
2) only ship development version -
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2013, 14:30 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
Having both versions of supertux in two different source packages
available in Debian is a good and user friendly idea IMO. At one point
in the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:03:51PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com
wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2013, 14:30 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
Having both versions of supertux in two different source packages
available in
Am Mittwoch, den 21.08.2013, 17:40 -0700 schrieb Josh Triplett:
Personally, I'd argue for 2, or failing that 3.
+1
- Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 19.08.2013 10:36, Vincent Cheng wrote:
[...]
If we were to change this, I'd be more inclined to go with Ubuntu's
approach here, i.e. package both and let users have the choice to
install one or both at the same time. In Ubuntu, they have
src:supertux which builds binary packages supertux
Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2013, 14:30 +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany:
Having both versions of supertux in two different source packages
available in Debian is a good and user friendly idea IMO. At one point
in the future, when the 0.3 series is considered stable, we will most
likely switch to
Hi Josh,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Package: supertux
Version: 0.1.3-3
Severity: wishlist
The supertux 0.3.x series has been in experimental for years now. Any
reason not to upload it to unstable?
No reason, aside from that's the state the
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:36:21AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Package: supertux
Version: 0.1.3-3
Severity: wishlist
The supertux 0.3.x series has been in experimental for years now. Any
reason not to upload
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:36:21AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
Package: supertux
Version: 0.1.3-3
Severity: wishlist
The supertux
Package: supertux
Version: 0.1.3-3
Severity: wishlist
The supertux 0.3.x series has been in experimental for years now. Any
reason not to upload it to unstable?
- Josh Triplett
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
13 matches
Mail list logo
