Richard, thanks for your contributions. Just for the avoidance of any
doubt, and since you didn't include a signed-off-by in your commits,
can you confirm that:
* You own the copyright in these submissions
* You intend for these to be distributed along with the rest of dgit
under dgit's
Ian,
your changes make sense; thanks for improving on my hamfisted first attempt.
As requested:
* I do own the copyright to everything I submitted
* I am fine with GPLv2+ (as it's using Git and Git is GPLv2) so GPLv3+
is fine as well
* I did this in my own free time
Do you need anything else?
Richard Hartmann writes (Re: Bug#721654: dgit: Support `dgit version`):
your changes make sense; thanks for improving on my hamfisted first attempt.
As requested:
* I do own the copyright to everything I submitted
* I am fine with GPLv2+ (as it's using Git and Git is GPLv2) so GPLv3
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#721654: dgit: Support `dgit version`):
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
Why can't I ? It's in the package.
Because many people do not install files from /usr/share/doc to save space
(with dpkg --path-exclude or tools doing something similar), because
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
I will think of a way of providing this that won't annoy me too much.
Richard, can you wait ?
Sure, no worries.
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013, Richard Hartmann wrote:
Perhaps dgit version should get the information from the first line
of /usr/share/doc/dgit/changelog.gz.
If you don't mind dgit depending on IO::Uncompress::Gunzip just for
that (and IO::Uncompress::Xz at some point), I will submit such a
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#721654: dgit: Support `dgit version`):
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013, Richard Hartmann wrote:
If you don't mind dgit depending on IO::Uncompress::Gunzip just for
that (and IO::Uncompress::Xz at some point), I will submit such a
patch.
Sorry, this is plain stupid
Richard Hartmann writes (Bug#721654: dgit: Support `dgit version`):
If you don't mind dgit depending on IO::Uncompress::Gunzip just for
that (and IO::Uncompress::Xz at some point), I will submit such a
patch.
Why not use zcat instead ?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Hi,
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
Why can't I ? It's in the package.
Because many people do not install files from /usr/share/doc to save space
(with dpkg --path-exclude or tools doing something similar), because some
derivatives (Emdebian) do this by default, etc.
Cheers,
--
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Because many people do not install files from /usr/share/doc to save space
(with dpkg --path-exclude or tools doing something similar), because some
derivatives (Emdebian) do this by default, etc.
Or maybe they run from
tags 721654 - patch
thanks
Richard Hartmann writes (Bug#721654: dgit: Support `dgit version`):
From: Richard Hartmann ric...@debian.org
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 21:04:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dgit*: Implement `dgit version`
Thanks, but I'm not sure how valuable this is. If people think
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Thanks, but I'm not sure how valuable this is. If people think it
would be helpful I don't mind it existing, but:
Well, it's one of the most common functions of any program. Myself, I
realized it was missing
Package: dgit
Version: 0.13
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Please see attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale:
13 matches
Mail list logo
