David Kalnischkies writes:
> I don't have much time at the moment, but I guess the attached
> patch should do this in the simplest/laziest way we have available.
> It would be nice if you could test it, though.
Sure, no problem; I'm happy to confirm that it works like a charm, and
that no furthe
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> David Kalnischkies writes:
>
>> "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e" is the md5 of an empty file.
>> "89f331147b07a354262948559d430f0b" is the md5 of our test file.
>> So the code calculates the right md5, but the expectation is wrong.
>
> AFAI
David Kalnischkies writes:
> "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e" is the md5 of an empty file.
> "89f331147b07a354262948559d430f0b" is the md5 of our test file.
> So the code calculates the right md5, but the expectation is wrong.
AFAICT, the d41... value comes from a second pass through the file
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> The Hurd and kFreeBSD builds of apt have all been failing libapt's
> test suite, so all three architectures are still on 0.9.10:
>
> Test FAILED: »d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e« ==
> »89f331147b07a354262948559d430f0b« at line 130
> Tes
Source: apt
Version: 0.9.11.2
Severity: normal
The Hurd and kFreeBSD builds of apt have all been failing libapt's
test suite, so all three architectures are still on 0.9.10:
Test FAILED: »d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e« ==
»89f331147b07a354262948559d430f0b« at line 130
Testing with HashSum
5 matches
Mail list logo
