Frank Loeffler writes:
> Is it known (ideally by upstream) whether the OpenMP pragmas are
> correct, i.e. that there are no bugs when OpenMP is enabled?
Well, there ae no *known* bugs, but absence of proof is not proof of
absence, of course :-)
> I agree with upstream that disabling OpenMP by not
Hi,
Is it known (ideally by upstream) whether the OpenMP pragmas are
correct, i.e. that there are no bugs when OpenMP is enabled? I agree
with upstream that disabling OpenMP by not giving the relevant compiler
flags is not a problem, but it is still strange to have pragmas but not
to use them when
Upstream says: is this really a problem? OpenMP is only used to
accelerate a tiny portion of the conversion; if OMP is unavailable, the
code works fine, just a bit slower. We don't call any functions of the
OMP runtime explicitly, so the dependency is a soft one.
Given that we can gracefully sca
Control: tag 721931 pending
I think I know how to fix it, need to talk with upstream first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: imagevis3d
For some reason, code is using openmp, but does not set gcc flags:
g++ -c -DPACKAGE_MANAGER -g -O2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -std=c++0x
-fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=f
5 matches
Mail list logo
