Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > Dnia 2013-10-09, śro o godzinie 21:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt pisze: > > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:10 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > > > Dnia 2013-10-02, śro o godzinie 01:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois pisze: > > > > Cyril

Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-10-10 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2013-10-09, śro o godzinie 21:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt pisze: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:10 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > > Dnia 2013-10-02, śro o godzinie 01:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois pisze: > > > Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-23): > > > > The squeeze.diff one se

Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:10 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > Dnia 2013-10-02, śro o godzinie 01:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois pisze: > > Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-23): > > > The squeeze.diff one seems to have unrelated noise in patches, > > > presumably because something refre

Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-10-04 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2013-10-02, śro o godzinie 01:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois pisze: > Hi again Tomasz, > > Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-23): > > The squeeze.diff one seems to have unrelated noise in patches, > > presumably because something refreshed them while you were preparing > > the diff? Having a targeted patc

Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable

2013-10-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi again Tomasz, Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-23): > The squeeze.diff one seems to have unrelated noise in patches, > presumably because something refreshed them while you were preparing > the diff? Having a targeted patched like the first one would be nice, > so please follow up to 723...@bugs.debia