Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2016-09-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi IOhannes, Giulio, and others, Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2014-02-03 22:56:52) > Looking at the output I suspect some place in the code _lacks_ sorting > (as opposed to sorting language-dependent). I believe the recent > update to Perl 5.18 introduced some deliberate randomization of >

Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2014-02-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.122 Followup-For: Bug #724281 Dear Maintainer, i'm experiencing the same problem. after a suggestion from jonas that it might be related to locales, i tried running the licensecheck with the following locales: C en_US.utf-8 de_AT.utf-8 for testing i chose the

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2014-02-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi IOhannes, Quoting IOhannes m zmoelnig (2014-02-03 17:18:52) after a suggestion from jonas that it might be related to locales, i tried running the licensecheck with the following locales: C en_US.utf-8 de_AT.utf-8 Right, that is one issue. More specifically it is LC_COLLATE (i.e.

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-25 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 24/09/2013 12:44, Giulio Paci ha scritto: Dear Vasudev, On 24/09/2013 05:32, Vasudev Kamath wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, today I noticed the same behaviour while packaging another software. In this case I am not regenerating

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-24 Thread Giulio Paci
Dear Vasudev, On 24/09/2013 05:32, Vasudev Kamath wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, today I noticed the same behaviour while packaging another software. In this case I am not regenerating autoconf files at all, so I think this is a

Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Giulio Paci
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.122 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while packaging sptk (git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk.git) I encountered a strange behaviour of the license check code. Invoking the command: DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules pre-build a copyright_newhints

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 12:01:18) Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.122 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while packaging sptk (git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk.git) I encountered a strange behaviour of the license check code. Invoking the command: DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Giulio Paci
On 23/09/2013 12:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 12:01:18) Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.122 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while packaging sptk (git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk.git) I encountered a strange behaviour of the license check code.

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 12:15:11) On 23/09/2013 12:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 12:01:18) Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.122 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while packaging sptk (git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk.git) I encountered a

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Giulio Paci
On 23/09/2013 12:36, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Sounds like a problem with your build routines doing autoreconf and not cleaning up properly - or that the autoreconf'ing is applied before copyright check. This was also my first thought. However: 1) the clean procedure works properly; 2) running

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 19:03:11) On 23/09/2013 12:36, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Sounds like a problem with your build routines doing autoreconf and not cleaning up properly - or that the autoreconf'ing is applied before copyright check. This was also my first thought. However:

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Giulio Paci
On 23/09/2013 19:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I just tried this: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk cd sptk debian/rules pre-build DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules clean DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 debian/copyright_newhints debian/copyright_hints

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 21:02:08) On 23/09/2013 19:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I just tried this: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk cd sptk debian/rules pre-build DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules clean DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 23/09/2013 22:07, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto: Quoting Giulio Paci (2013-09-23 21:02:08) On 23/09/2013 19:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I just tried this: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sptk cd sptk debian/rules pre-build DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot

Bug#724281: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#724281: Bug#724281: cdbs: license check a lot of time results in an error

2013-09-23 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, today I noticed the same behaviour while packaging another software. In this case I am not regenerating autoconf files at all, so I think this is a real bug. I disagree on this I and Jonas use copyright check