On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:50:03AM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[1] I repeat I am not arguing about the values, I am arguing that a
package which aim to replace the init must change a setting which aren't
related to the package functionality.
Hi Goffredo,
upstream value for the sysrq
Hi Zbyszek
On 2013-11-28 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:50:03AM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[1] I repeat I am not arguing about the values, I am arguing that a
package which aim to replace the init must change a setting which aren't
related to the
So we're in agreement, except for this last point...
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This is the point where we have a totally different opinion:
- is job of systemd to set the sysctl values ? Yes.
- is job of systemd decide *which values* have to be set ?
Hi Zbyszek
On 2013-11-28 20:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
So we're in agreement, except for this last point...
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This is the point where we have a totally different opinion:
- is job of systemd to set the sysctl
Hi Goffredo,
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it writes:
Systemd has as main target Fedora. Debian is different from Fedora, so
Nope.
systemd is not targeting one distribution as its main target. It is
running on many distributions, with no particular focus on any single
one of them.
--
Hi Michael,
On 2013-11-28 21:51, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Goffredo,
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it writes:
Systemd has as main target Fedora. Debian is different from Fedora, so
Nope.
systemd is not targeting one distribution as its main target. It is
running on many
6 matches
Mail list logo
