RedHat seems to have relevant information here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609463#c20
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> B)
> # ip link add brX type bridge
> # ip link set brX address XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
> Witch B) the bridge seems to works fine, at least in simple scenarios
> (I did no extensive testing).
What kernel were you using?
> tracing this problem please let me know. As for my “special” problem,
> I will
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 01:36:41 +0100
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> First tests went really wrong.
>
> I have this setup:
>
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
> address X.X.X.X
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> bridge_ports all
> bridge_fd 2
> bridge_stp on
>
> I already knew all this, but I really don't like a tool for everything, so I
> wasn't willing to do this change, but I have just changed my mind and I see
> that this may be the right time to do the change, so we'll give this a
> chance and if it doesn't work we'll go back to the old way.
>
> Th
On Dec 08 2013, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> After doing some more reading I learned that brctl uses ioctl (just
> like ifconfig) and will probably be deprecated at some point in the
> (far away) future. A lot bridge functionality is available within the
> version of the iproute2 package available i
Hi,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:37:14 +0100
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> So... the question would be... on your setup do you have a network
> card attached?
I have no interface attached to the bridge (as you can see from my
commands I didn't use any »ip link set … master br2« or add »brctl
addif
Hi again.
> Unfortunately it doesn't, see the output below:
Well, I read your mail after having a new version written with my suggestion
and I'm not really sure your testings apply to a "real" bridge. I mean... I
have tested it and ended with a working bridge. The difference here may be
that I ha
Hi,
thank you for looking into this! Sorry for not responding to your
previous mail (I really didn't have anything to add at that point
though).
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 01:35:37 +0100
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> While I was investigating your suggestion I realised that if I set
> the hw addres
Hi!
> I came into the situation where I wanted to assign a specific hw address
> to a bridge device. However, using the bridge_hw option didn't work for
> me as I wasn't adding any interfaces to the bridge (the bridge is used
> for attaching virtualbox VMs which somehow magically work without `br
Hi!
Thanks for your bug report.
Your report reminds me of a conversation with a fellow Debian folk that was
asking me if bridge-utils were needed at all now that iproute has the power
of creating bridges.
I still think we need bridge-utils, but... the question here is... should we
create the int
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.5-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I came into the situation where I wanted to assign a specific hw address
to a bridge device. However, using the bridge_hw option didn't work for
me as I wasn't adding any interfaces to the bridge (the bridge i
11 matches
Mail list logo
