On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I'm still not sure why the virus contained in the source could not be
replaced by the EICAR test signature.
Because it’s not testing a virus scanner, but because the
specific RFC822 message in question
Jarkko Palviainen jarkko.palviainen at f-secure.com writes:
I looked into one of these, libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-
perl_1.531.orig.tar.gz, and found multipart email file containing zip
attachment. Inside this archive is a .pif file (PE32 executable for MS
Windows)
which is detected
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I'm still not sure why the virus contained in the source could not be
replaced by the EICAR test signature.
Because it’s not testing a virus scanner, but because the
specific RFC822 message in question exhibited multiple problems
in the code, due to
* Dominik George:
It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
contain the virus sample.
That's non-free code and not suitable for main, so it must be removed
from the source tarball anyway.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: general
Severity: normal
Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner while
downloading.
These are the exact downloads:
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libm/libmime-explode-perl/libmime-
explode-perl_0.39.orig.tar.gz
Hi,
I have looked into this a bit.
Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner while
downloading.
Using a gateway anti-virus scanner for downloads from the Debian archive
seems a bit inappropriate, well, paranoid. Checking the signed hashsums
would seem a lot
Pymilter is a false positive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, October 15, 2013 12:54, Dominik George wrote:
I looked into one of these, libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-
perl_1.531.orig.tar.gz, and found multipart email file containing zip
attachment. Inside this archive is a .pif file (PE32 executable for MS
Windows)
which is detected as
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 13:19:38 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
contain the virus sample. However, it *is* a false positive, as the
sample is there intentionally, and no virus scanner can guess the reason
why it is there.
On Tue, October 15, 2013 14:09, Dominique Dumont wrote:
In libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl case, the virus is used on the
non-regressions test which are shipped in the original tarball (and in
Debian *source* package). This virus is *not* shipped in Debian binary
package.
I'm still
On 10/15/2013 03:09 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 13:19:38 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact
contain the virus sample. However, it *is* a false positive, as the
sample is there intentionally, and no virus
On 2013-10-15 11:54, Dominik George wrote:
[Jarkko Palviainen; attribution lost in quoted mail]
http://ftp.fi.debian.org/[...]
If you suspect an issue with the Debian archive, please test against
ftp.debian.org.
That's not particularly great advice. ftp.debian.org is just another
Boots fine if the image is not persistent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com wrote:
Boots fine if the image is not persistent.
Sorry. Wrong bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
