Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

Hello, On 21 November 2013 10:51, David Baron wrote: > So a changes notification with instructions may be in order. > Issue might not even apply to my setup, but if I do encounter it, where do I > change the options? The problem here is that I'm not sure what to do with this bug. I could patch u

Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

On Thursday, 21 November, 2013 10:40:36 Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On 21 November 2013 10:23, David Baron wrote: > > Updated now to 0.7.46-1. Anything new. Bug is a month old. > > Well, it's not strictly a bug... It's rather incorrect usage. If you > use static IPv6 address assignment, y

Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

Hello, On 21 November 2013 10:23, David Baron wrote: > Updated now to 0.7.46-1. Anything new. Bug is a month old. Well, it's not strictly a bug... It's rather incorrect usage. If you use static IPv6 address assignment, you must wait for DAD to complete before using the address. If you use allow-

Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.44 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Updated now to 0.7.46-1. Anything new. Bug is a month old. Related to #723184 posted around same time? --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae Debian Release: jessie/sid