Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to interfaces [and 1 more messages]

2014-02-07 Thread Sam Hartman
Yeah, I now understand what you mean by L. I'll be writing more in the form of a blog post and probably GR text. I will send a pointer to the TC as I think I may be hitting close to something that Russ may find useful. I'll refrain from trying to convince the TC because you have enough voices t

Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to interfaces [and 1 more messages]

2014-02-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Hedderly writes ("Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to interfaces [and 1 more messages]"): > Ian Jackson wrote: > > Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to > > interfaces"): > >> I now understand Ian

Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to interfaces [and 1 more messages]

2014-02-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to interfaces"): > Hmm, I am reading Ian as against 3. No, if there are multiple implementations then I am satisfied. In practice I don't think the problem of implementations only non-overlapping subsets of init systems will