Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-20 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 2013-11-17 om 11:15 schreef Geert Stappers: Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID Is it correct to

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-20 Thread Bjørn Mork
Geert Stappers stapp...@stappers.nl writes: Op 2013-11-17 om 11:15 schreef Geert Stappers: Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-17 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID Is it correct to expect an increase in size of the .ko with a few bytes?

Bug#728535: which size increment to expect

2013-11-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: Op 2013-11-17 om 10:55 schreef Geert Stappers: Edit on the kernel module source file, to add USB ID. Executed `fakeroot debian/rules binary-arh Produced a same size .ko, but it should be bigger due the extra USB ID Is it