Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013-11-25 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Dan S wrote: > 2013/11/6 Felipe Sateler : >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S wrote: >>> >>> Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I >>> propose that we restrict archs for one package >>> "supercollider-supernova". The package is opti

Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013-11-24 Thread Dan S
2013/11/6 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S wrote: >> >> Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I >> propose that we restrict archs for one package >> "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a >> non-default drop-in alternat

Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013-11-06 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S wrote: > > Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I > propose that we restrict archs for one package > "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a > non-default drop-in alternative to "supercollider-server") and

Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013-11-03 Thread Dan S
Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I propose that we restrict archs for one package "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a non-default drop-in alternative to "supercollider-server") and there is very little upstream support for getting it wo

Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013-11-03 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: supercollider Version: 1:3.6.3~repack-3 Severity: serious Hi, supercollider FTBFS on the sparc and powerpc buildds, but was built there successfully in the past. Since sparc and powerpc are candidates for release architectures, this failure prevents testing migration. ~Niels Ref: http