Hi Adrian,
On 01/04/2017 08:50 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The current version 7.4.4-3 of libatomic-ops builds fine on all architectures
> [1].
> Can we close this or am I missing something?
I understand that they are building because the tests are being bypassed as
an
Hi!
The current version 7.4.4-3 of libatomic-ops builds fine on all architectures
[1].
Can we close this or am I missing something?
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libatomic-ops
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`.
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:12:24 +0100 gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - pending
>
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:05:22 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
>
> > The patch has not been applied because it is not clear it is correct
> >
> > There is a thread that starts at [1] and
The patch has not been applied because it is not clear it is correct
There is a thread that starts at [1] and ended inconclusively at [2]
It's unfortunate that the number of people who understand power memory ordering
issues at the level required can probably be counted on one hand. But I don't
Control: tag -1 - pending
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:05:22 +1100, Ian Wienand wrote:
> The patch has not been applied because it is not clear it is correct
>
> There is a thread that starts at [1] and ended inconclusively at [2]
>
> It's unfortunate that the number of people who understand power
Control: tags 728955 + pending
Dear maintainer,
Fernando Seiti Furusato has prepared an NMU for libatomic-ops
(versioned as 7.4.2-1.2) and I've uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please
feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -
6 matches
Mail list logo