Hi Guillem,
On 2014-01-19 23:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 19:30:19 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2014-01-15 14:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 13:20:38 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
The only currently supported output format is rpm, which consists
of a li
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 19:30:19 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2014-01-15 14:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 13:20:38 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> >>>The only currently supported output format is rpm, which consists
> >>>of a line for every path that failed any check. The
On 2014-01-15 14:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 13:20:38 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.5
Severity: wishlist
dpkg's manpage hints on the meaning of the output of dpkg --verify:
I guess we have a different understanding of what “hints” means. The
desc
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 13:20:38 -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.17.5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> dpkg's manpage hints on the meaning of the output of dpkg --verify:
I guess we have a different understanding of what “hints” means. The
description seems pretty detailed to me
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.5
Severity: wishlist
dpkg's manpage hints on the meaning of the output of dpkg --verify:
The only currently supported output format is rpm, which consists of a line for
every path that failed any check. The lines start with 9 characters to report
the specific check
5 matches
Mail list logo
