On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:51:15PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> This bug report isn't so bad after all because it would be nice if all
> packages migrated to Groovy 2.x including libxbean-java. Supporting
> Groovy 1.x and Groovy 2.x is currently a necessity but we should aim for
> supporting
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 libxbean-java: please support Groovy 2.x
On 22.05.2015 21:47, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> *sigh*
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion. libxbean-java still FTBFS when it is built
>> agains
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> *sigh*
>
> Sorry for the confusion. libxbean-java still FTBFS when it is built
> against a 2.x version of Groovy.
>
> Reopening this bug.
However, if libxbean-java doesn't plan to port their code to Groovy 2.x
I think we can c
Control: reopen 733099
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:47:43 -0300 Miguel Landaeta
wrote:
> Package: src:libxbean-java
> Version: 3.7-5
> Severity: important
>
> I rebuilt this package in experimental to check its compatibility with
> Groovy 2.2.1 and I found this error during build time.
*sigh*
Sorry
Package: src:libxbean-java
Version: 3.7-5
Severity: important
I rebuilt this package in experimental to check its compatibility with
Groovy 2.2.1 and I found this error during build time.
(I'm including a complete build log attached)
Relevant error messages:
[...]
[INFO] ---
5 matches
Mail list logo
