Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2016-12-28 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Source: spice Followup-For: Bug #734218 Hi, Please find here my patch to build on all little endian architectures. I also dropped the -dbg package and let debhelper build one automatically. Cheers, Laurent Bigonville -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-de

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2016-12-13 Thread Liang Guo
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > on Fedora, spice is built on x86, x86_64 and armv7hl and aarch64 > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=819309) > > The package is maintained by Christophe Fergeau who is also spice upstream, > so I would trust what fedo

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2016-12-07 Thread Riku Voipio
severity 734218 important user debian-...@lists.debian.org usertags 734218 arm64 thanks Wookeys patch looks good to me. Liang, Michael, can you upload or are you ok with an NMU? Riku

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2016-12-06 Thread Wookey
OK. I did a test build for arm64 and it builds fine. Debian should default to building all arches unless there is a good reason why it won't work. So far as I am aware there is no particular reason to restrict this package to x86, even if that's all upstream cares about. The attached patch enable

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2016-11-26 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:46:31 +0400 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 05.03.2014 15:02, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Where can I find the rationale for limiting the spice package to amd64 > > and i386 only? I need it on arm to use it with my Raspberry Pi, and > > fail to understand why the Debian package

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2014-03-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
05.03.2014 15:02, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Where can I find the rationale for limiting the spice package to amd64 > and i386 only? I need it on arm to use it with my Raspberry Pi, and > fail to understand why the Debian package is missing there. http://www.spice-space.org/page/FAQ -- see the

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2014-03-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Where can I find the rationale for limiting the spice package to amd64 and i386 only? I need it on arm to use it with my Raspberry Pi, and fail to understand why the Debian package is missing there. According to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ >, the package is built for armv7hl

Bug#734218: spice: Please support powerpcspe (and maybe other architectures)

2014-01-04 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: spice Version: 0.12.4-0nocelt2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc Usertags: powerpcspe Hi, I can't find a good reason why spice shouldn't be supported on platforms different from i386 and amd64 (and arm). Therefore, I just built it on powerpcspe. See att