It's currently not possible to reinstall (or, when a new release comes
along, upgrade to a newer version) because postinst is doing, as Eric
pointed out, (essentially) an a2enmod mpm_itk--and this call fails if
mpm_itk is already enabled.
The problem belongs to apache2, however:
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2014-02-03 20:55, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I am completely unable to reproduce this. I purged everything *apache* from
my sid machine, installed libapache2-mpm-itk with apt-get, and it installed
without a hitch.
So, whether this is a bug or not, it's
reassign 734865 apache2,libapache2-mpm-itk
thanks
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:35:51PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
There is some module conflict ...
Jason Rhinelander debugged this earlier today; it seems like mpm_prefork
declares a conflict with mpm_itk. But I guess the issue of mpm_event is
severity 734865 normal
thanks
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Hi,
I am completely
On 2014-02-03 20:55, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I am completely unable to reproduce this. I purged everything *apache* from
my sid machine, installed libapache2-mpm-itk with apt-get, and it installed
without a hitch.
The logfile has the piuparts command line used for the test at the top,
you
I encountered this bug as well.
The postinstall script ends up calling:
a2enmod -m -q mpm_itk
which prints:
WARNING: MPM_ITK is a third party module that is not part of the
official Apache HTTPD. It has seen less testing than the official MPM
modules.
ERROR: Module mpm_event is enabled -
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:05:10PM -, Eric Messick wrote:
I encountered this bug as well.
The postinstall script ends up calling:
a2enmod -m -q mpm_itk
which prints:
WARNING: MPM_ITK is a third party module that is not part of the
official Apache HTTPD. It has seen less testing
Hi Steinar,
On 16.01.2014 21:22, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I think this is a separate issue; it was discussed when we split out mpm-itk
as a separate package, and the general sentiment was that it will work for
wheezy - jessie, but not necessarily sid - sid (the latter is not strictly
Package: libapache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.4.7-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + apache2-mpm-itk
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Is this really legit? From the log:
invoke-rc.d:
On 2014-01-10 15:15, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
11 matches
Mail list logo
