On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Joachim Reichel wrote:
I've looked again at multiarch support for CGAL based on your patch. I've
attached my current version of it. The reverse dependencies build fine (yade
fails for unrelated reasons).
One Qt -dev package declares a Conflicts: between the i386 and amd64 v
Hi Marc,
I've looked again at multiarch support for CGAL based on your patch. I've
attached my current version of it. The reverse dependencies build fine (yade
fails for unrelated reasons).
One Qt -dev package declares a Conflicts: between the i386 and amd64 variant,
and one GLU -dev package does
On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, Joachim Reichel wrote:
Unfortunately, MPFI does not support it yet. I've filed a wishlist bug
for that.
Thanks. I thought MPFI wasn't a dependency of any of the cgal packages, so
this shouldn't block. Qt4 is likely to be a bigger issue, though it seems
ok to have a multia
Hi Marc,
I agree that multi-arch support for CGAL would be nice. Unfortunately, MPFI does
not support it yet. I've filed a wishlist bug for that.
In the meantime I'm going to look at your patch and probably use it as a
starting point and see what's needed to complete multi-arch support.
Regards,
Package: libcgal-dev
Version: 4.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
now that boost supports multiarch installations, it would be nice if
cgal did as well. I am mostly interested in testing i386 applications
but also test armhf with qemu sometimes.
What I am pasting below (based on 4.2) should not be c
5 matches
Mail list logo