Bug#737354: retext: Missing dependency on python3-markdown | python3-docutils.

2014-02-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Aleksej wrote: > But the field is in a different package, so you have to look at the > Recommends of a dependency to see it. At least with aptitude, that's not as > intuitive as a direct Recommends. And the description says it is "for > Markdown and reStructuredT

Bug#737354: retext: Missing dependency on python3-markdown | python3-docutils.

2014-02-03 Thread Aleksej
Hi, On 2014-02-03 16:25, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: ReText can work without any built-in markups (using only custom ones). Also it can be used in plain text mode. I think the current Recommends: field is right. But the field is in a different package, so you have to look at the Recommends of a de

Bug#737354: retext: Missing dependency on python3-markdown | python3-docutils.

2014-02-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi, On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Aleksej wrote: > The version of ReText in wheezy depends on > python-markdown | python-docutils, and also recommends them. > > The package in jessie/sid depends on python3-markups, but python3-markups > 0.4-1 only **recommends** python3-docutils and python3-mar

Bug#737354: retext: Missing dependency on python3-markdown | python3-docutils.

2014-02-01 Thread Aleksej
Package: retext Version: 4.1.1-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The version of ReText in wheezy depends on python-markdown | python-docutils, and also recommends them. The package in jessie/sid depends on python3-markups, but python3-markups 0.4-1 only **recommends** python3-docutils and