* Mike Miller mtmil...@debian.org [2015-08-29 18:55]:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:59:17 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
I changed the control file in the debian package (see attachments).
default-jre-headless is now not in Depends but in Build-Depends and
Recommends. The resulting octave-debian
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:59:17 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
I changed the control file in the debian package (see attachments).
default-jre-headless is now not in Depends but in Build-Depends and
Recommends. The resulting octave-debian packages does the job.
In case somebody wants to use
On 2015-07-16 07:00, Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:59:32 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:00:33 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
Octave should not have a strong dependency on openjdk. Any of the
following solutions would do:
1) the dependency should be changed
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:59:32 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:00:33 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
Octave should not have a strong dependency on openjdk. Any of the
following solutions would do:
1) the dependency should be changed to recommended, and/or
2) it should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Recently, I tried to remove openjdk-[6-8] from a number of machines
because of the large number of open security issues with openjdk
(currently there are 23, 21 and 20 open security issues on openjdk-6,
openjdk-7, and openjdk-8, resp.). I learned
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 10:00 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
3) keeping the java dependency in a octave package octave-java as
it was before 3.8.x
This is impossible because that package does not exist anymore for
Octave 3.8 or higher.
The current dependency is default-jre-headless. This should be
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:00:33 +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
Octave should not have a strong dependency on openjdk. Any of the
following solutions would do:
1) the dependency should be changed to recommended, and/or
2) it should allow for some alternative java engine (e.g. gcj or
whatever).
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 17:08 +, Leo Butler wrote:
Matlab compatibility is an ephemera and JWE himself has written
against it being a goal that drives Octave development.
He never wrote against it. He just said that in the beginning it
wasn't a goal. Being compatible with Matlab is now
Package: octave
Version: 3.6.4-4+b2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Since Octave introduced its java-dependent gui (congrats) in v3.8.1, I
have been unable/unwilling to upgrade. I believe that these graphical
dependencies should be downgraded to *recommended* and/or a separate
octave-nox
Control: found -1 3.8.1-1
Control: notfound -1 3.6.4-4+b2
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 14:30:30 +, Leo Butler wrote:
Since Octave introduced its java-dependent gui (congrats) in v3.8.1, I
have been unable/unwilling to upgrade. I believe
Control: found -1 3.8.1-1
Control: notfound -1 3.6.4-4+b2
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 14:30:30 +, Leo Butler wrote:
Since Octave introduced its java-dependent gui (congrats) in v3.8.1, I
have been unable/unwilling to
11 matches
Mail list logo
