Bug#742864: Update to jdk8u20-b18

2014-06-21 Thread Thomas Klute
Am 18.06.2014 14:55, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Even if removing the generated files could avoid mistakes like updating the control file but not its template, I lean toward keeping them for the convenience. Checking out the package and not seeing debian/control could also be confusing. I

Bug#742864: Update to jdk8u20-b18

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Klute
Am 17.06.2014 22:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 17/06/2014 20:09, Thomas Klute a écrit : * g++-4.9 was a hardcoded build dependency, but is not available on stable. I could build the package with g++-4.7 from Wheezy, so I've changed the dependency to g++ = 4.7. Actually debian/control

Bug#742864: Update to jdk8u20-b18

2014-06-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/06/2014 14:25, Thomas Klute a écrit : OK, I didn't know about that. I that case I suggest removing debian/control from the repository after that step is documented. I've added a note about debian/control in README.source. Even if removing the generated files could avoid mistakes like

Bug#742864: Update to jdk8u20-b18

2014-06-17 Thread Thomas Klute
Hi everyone, I've cloned Emmanuel's repository and worked with it on Wheezy (amd64). Results so far: * I've updated the build system to work with the newest upstream version (jdk8u29-b18). Refreshing the patches was fairly straightforward, but I'd be great if someone with more knowledge of

Bug#742864: Update to jdk8u20-b18

2014-06-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Thomas, Thank you very much for your help with OpenJDK 8. Le 17/06/2014 20:09, Thomas Klute a écrit : * g++-4.9 was a hardcoded build dependency, but is not available on stable. I could build the package with g++-4.7 from Wheezy, so I've changed the dependency to g++ = 4.7. Actually