Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-17 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: retitle -1 debsums causes piuparts to claim all packages modified migrated conffile /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf Looking at the debsums bugs, I suspect this is the same problem reported in URL: http://bugs.debian.org/689508 on 2012-10-03. The problem at hand now is that

Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 17. April 2014, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Looking at the debsums bugs, I suspect this is the same problem reported in URL: http://bugs.debian.org/689508 on 2012-10-03. yes, #744398 indeed seems to be caused by #689508. Thanks for digging that up! The problem at hand now

Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Control: retitle -1 debsums claim migrated conffile /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf was modified signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 06:59:31PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Thank you for the analysis. The file is moved from sysvinit-utils to startpar, and modified to point to the new location of the startpar-upstart-inject script, so the file is supposed to be changed, both overship and

Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 13. April 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: It doesn't look like a wrong migration to me. Is piuparts failing to notice that the conffile now has a new owner? Technically, I think dpkg will show it as having *two* owners in the database, until the next upgrade of sysvinit, with

Bug#744398: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#744398: startpar modifies /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf

2014-04-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Steve Langasek] The piuparts bug is that piuparts *thinks there's anything wrong*. It is *correct* that the conffile's contents have changed on upgrade, and piuparts is misreporting this as an error. I asked on