Hi!
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 13:14:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm closing this bug, because:
> - The derivatives information is now gathered in a single table titled
> 'Derivatives', which makes it clear that it is not centered on Ubuntu.
> - That table is that the bottom of the page, making
On 17/04/15 at 22:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 13:14:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I'm closing this bug, because:
> > - The derivatives information is now gathered in a single table titled
> > 'Derivatives', which makes it clear that it is not centered on
package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
[18:20] < h01ger> | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
commercial product...
[18:28] < h01ger> | SamB: also there are other useful commercial
products, also debian based. i d
I couldn't agree more with this. Please remove Ubuntu or hide it by default.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: qa.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> [18:20] < h01ger> | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
> http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
> commercial product...
> [18:28] < h01ger> | SamB: also there are
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> I find it convenient and rather helpful to display Ubuntu-specific
> data about my packages on UDD and other similar resources (PTS/DDPO),
> and I'd rather not see this feature outright removed. I have no
I outright object its removal. Ubuntu has a lot
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is there
> and only those bothered by it -- a minority -- will need to take action to
> disable it), though. That's fine.
My feelings are tota
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is there
> > and only those bothered by it -- a minority -- will need to take action
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:37:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > > Its display can be optional (default enabled so that people know it is
> > > the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't have a particularly strong opinion on whether Ubuntu bugs should be
> displayed in the dashboard by default; but I don't have the impression that
> people who are objecting to it are doing so out of a desire to improve
> Debian, only
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:34:51PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [18:20] < h01ger> | is there a way to hide the ubuntu table in
> http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ? i'm really not interested in that
> commercial product...
I'm biased, so I'm responding with the most biased email I hav
On 22/04/14 at 15:01 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Based on a survey of the bug links in the Debian derivatives census,
> only Ubuntu and UltimediaOS assign bugs to individual packages. The
> latter doesn't appear to have an easy way to link to bugs for
> individual packages.
>
> https://lists.debian.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:04:36AM +0200, Christophe Siraut wrote:
>
> Such an explicit option would actually make us pay more attention to the
> derivatives IMO. Let people read what they want to, without asking :)
This is the argumentation I never understand: why adding an option about
derivati
Ana Guerrero Lopez écrivait:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:04:36AM +0200, Christophe Siraut wrote:
> >
> > Such an explicit option would actually make us pay more attention to the
> > derivatives IMO. Let people read what they want to, without asking :)
>
> This is the argumentation I never unders
14 matches
Mail list logo
