* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140504 01:03]:
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
merging reasonable contributions, and
On Sun, May 4, 2014 10:33, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140504 01:03]:
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
the multiple available init systems in Debian. That
I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
- Why are we loosing time to discuss the timeline of uploads, to see if
there was upstart support at some
Thomas Goirand writes (Bug#746715: Shocking read ...):
I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
This is backwards.
If the maintainer had a problem
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting existing
support without a
Kurt Roeckx writes (Re: Bug#746715: Shocking read ...):
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
merging reasonable contributions
2014-05-03 19:53 GMT+02:00 Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk:
Thomas Goirand writes (Bug#746715: Shocking read ...):
I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
wrote that Steve could have
7 matches
Mail list logo
