On 27/05/14 23:11, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
tags 747609 + confirmed pending
forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
thanks
Thanks!
On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On
tags 747609 + confirmed pending
forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
thanks
On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
tags 747609 + confirmed pending
forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html
thanks
Thanks!
On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make
sure that ruby2.0 is also not included in jessie.
Similar to the ruby1.9.1-rm transition, we
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the
process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings.
As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file.
Thanks,
Christian
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make
sure that ruby2.0
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [140511 01:35]:
Please file a serious bug against ruby2.0 titled something like do not
ship with jessie, and tag it jessie and sid.
Filed as #747679.
-ch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
7 matches
Mail list logo