Christian PERRIER wrote...
Please check things carefully as I'm not completly sure that I could
follow all details discussions during this review
I am attaching the updated version of debian/control. Only the last
paragraph was changed.
Christoph
Source: debian-security-support
Justin B Rye wrote...
If we need a synonym for limited that clearly isn't talking about
duration, we might talk about support being reduced or downgraded
or something. Or looking at the version in my last patch:
Oops, that explains something. I didn't realize limited could be
understood in a
On Wed, May 28, 2014 06:39, Christian PERRIER wrote:
This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for debian-security-support.
From debian/control:
for which support has had to be limited
The form 'has had to be' seems contructed to me and also general writing
advice
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 06:39, Christian PERRIER wrote:
This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for debian-security-support.
From debian/control:
for which support has had to be limited
The form 'has had to be' seems contructed to me
Christian PERRIER wrote...
debian/control:
Source: debian-security-support
(...)
Description: Debian security support coverage checker
For some Debian packages, it is not feasible to maintain full security
support for all use cases through the full distribution release
cycle.
.
This
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote...
The two Debconf templates miss a bit of what now? information, in my
opinion. Especially the /limited one: as an admin, I get the message
that one of my packages is now in 'limited' support, where can I find out
what that means?
That information is in other places,
Christian PERRIER wrote...
Please check things carefully as I'm not completly sure that I could
follow all details discussions during this review
Aye, same here.
As written before, there are more files that should be part of an l10n
else users will see mixed languages. Therefore I am
On Wed, 28 May 2014 12:45:51 +0200
Christoph Biedl wrote:
is limited used for packages which eg. has been doomed its EOL?
if that's it, it will better to say like security support *period*
--
victory
no need to CC me :-)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/102724 0.0.1.4
victory wrote...
[ no context ]
is limited used for packages which eg. has been doomed its EOL?
if that's it, it will better to say like security support *period*
This is from the package description:
| This package provides a program to identify installed packages for
| which support has
Christoph Biedl wrote:
victory wrote...
is limited used for packages which eg. has been doomed its EOL?
if that's it, it will better to say like security support *period*
This is from the package description:
| This package provides a program to identify installed packages for
| which
This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for debian-security-support.
The reviewed templates will be sent on Friday, May 30, 2014 to this bug report
and a mail will be sent to this list with [BTS] as a subject tag.
Please check things carefully as I'm not completly
11 matches
Mail list logo
