On 06/11/2014 09:08 AM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:01:13PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
otherwise I guess this should be reported upstream.
Thanks for putting in the legwork and bringing this back to my
attention. The same problem exists in OpenSSH (from which the
co
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:01:13PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> otherwise I guess this should be reported upstream.
Thanks for putting in the legwork and bringing this back to my
attention. The same problem exists in OpenSSH (from which the
compatibility layer for opensmtpd was taken), exc
On 06/10/2014 09:29 PM, Lorenzo wrote:
On 06/08/2014 11:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 17:48:18 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
after the latest openssl upgrade it happened again :)
While waiting to see upstream's reaction, could you rebuild the package
against the new version of t
On 06/08/2014 11:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 17:48:18 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
after the latest openssl upgrade it happened again :)
While waiting to see upstream's reaction, could you rebuild the package
against the new version of the library?
No, this should be fixed b
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 17:48:18 +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> after the latest openssl upgrade it happened again :)
> While waiting to see upstream's reaction, could you rebuild the package
> against the new version of the library?
>
No, this should be fixed by removing the broken check, not papering
after the latest openssl upgrade it happened again :)
While waiting to see upstream's reaction, could you rebuild the package
against the new version of the library?
PS
I'm reusing this bug because... well, it's the same bug after all, so I
hope it's ok - if it's not just tell me.
Also, since
6 matches
Mail list logo
